CVS Data Engineer Salary by Level
CVS data engineer compensation by level, from individual interview and offer reports. The numbers update as more reports land, so they stay current and data-engineer-specific rather than the generic software-engineer bands most pages quote.
Data engineer total comp by level
Each level's figure is the median of individual CVS data engineer offers at that level, so it reflects a typical outcome rather than an average pulled up by a few large packages. Total comp counts base salary plus equity and bonus annualized over the vest, and the range shown is the middle half of offers, with the top and bottom quarters trimmed off. These are data-engineer figures specifically, which run below the all-software-engineer bands most comp sites quote at the same level.
The staff rung at CVS carries 10 reports, which is solid enough to treat $186K as a reliable figure. The senior rung, at 12 reports, is the best-supported level on this ladder. Mid, with 9 reports, is thinner, so the $135K figure there deserves a wider mental band than the median alone implies. Across all 3 levels, 31 individual data engineer offers fed this ladder, a mix of directly verified submissions and base-only public filings where total comp is estimated from peer bonus and equity ratios. More weight belongs on the rungs where the headcount is deeper. The reporting window skews recent: the ladder reflects Aug 2, 2026 as the last refresh, so early-tenure offers from before CVS's current compensation structure may carry less relevance than the numbers imply at first look.
Every CVS comp sample on record
One dot per reported offer, plotted against years of experience and colored by level. Toggle levels or switch between total comp and base. The spread is the honest picture the medians summarize.
CVS's offer structure leans toward base salary, which is consistent with large healthcare employers that carry tighter equity budgets than their technology-sector peers. The public filings in this pool are base-only, and estimated totals are modeled from bonus ratios typical of the sector rather than CVS-specific disclosed targets. Engineers should expect a modest target bonus, likely tied to individual and business unit performance, rather than the RSU refresh cycles that dominate tech-company offers. That structure means the headline total comp number is relatively close to what lands in your account each year; there's less variance between the ladder figure and realized pay than you'd see at an equity-heavy employer. The spread from $135K to $186K across 3 levels is the primary comp story: the base is the comp, and the bonus layer adds something real but not transformative.
Culture and sentiment at CVS
What the offer feels like from the inside, not just the number. Glassdoor and forum readings plus happiness and layoff-risk signals, updated as new data lands.
CVS sits in line with other Healthcare companies, which makes sense given the structural constraints healthcare employers carry compared to software companies. PHI compliance obligations, narrow operating margins in pharmacy retail, and a workforce that blends clinical and technical roles all create budget pressure that tech employers don't face at the same intensity. The likeliest read is that CVS prices data engineering competitively enough to hire from the healthcare talent pool, but doesn't stretch to compete with AWS, Google, or large fintech shops for the same candidates. The Aetna acquisition added significant data complexity and presumably some headcount, but large integration projects typically pull budget toward delivery over compensation benchmarking. For an engineer whose alternatives are other healthcare or large-enterprise employers, in line with the peer cohort is a reasonable position; for someone with live competing offers from cloud or fintech shops, the gap is real and probably won't close at the offer stage.
Glassdoor and forum readings are third-party aggregates; the happiness and layoff-risk tiers are modeled weekly from primary signals.
How the offer level (and the comp curve) is decided
Your level is set during the loop, before team match. The band widens with seniority, so the same performance lands very different comp depending on which curve you get placed on.
The step from senior to staff is where the compensation arithmetic gets interesting at CVS: $149K to $186K is a larger jump than you typically see compressed into adjacent levels, so leveling in your favor at offer time outweighs almost any base negotiation at the same rung. If your experience includes cross-team pipeline ownership or data contract work across business units, make that case explicitly before compensation comes up, since the staff designation depends on it. Base is the component that actually moves; the bonus structure at this scale tends to be formula-driven and less negotiable. A competing offer from another healthcare employer is a credible lever because CVS draws from the same pool; an offer from a pure-play tech company is harder to match given the structural differences in equity. Arrive with the level case already built.
Recruiter calibration
The recruiter sets a target level from your experience and project scope, and shares a band. The band is a bracket, not the offer.
Interview loop ✕
Performance sets your final level. Strong rounds bump you a level; a weak round drops you. This is where the comp curve is decided.
Debrief / committee
Interviewers compare notes and set level and band. Consistency across rounds matters as much as any single strong one.
Offer + negotiation
Base, bonus, equity, and sign-on are visible. Equity usually has the widest band and is the main lever; a written competing offer moves it most.
Reading the equity, not just the headline number
The most misread part of a big-tech offer is the equity curve. A multi-year RSU grant is not a flat annual number, and what you negotiate should account for how it vests and refreshes.
Your offer includes a 4-year RSU grant worth $240K. What is your equity income in Year 4, and what should you actually negotiate?
Works out the vest: roughly $60K/yr if it vests evenly, and recognizes the original grant ends after 4 years, so without refreshers equity income drops in Year 4-5.
Negotiates the equity grant and the refresher expectation, not just base, and notes the grant is fixed in shares at signing so the dollar value floats with the stock.
Assumes the RSU value is a fixed cash amount that continues forever, and negotiates only base.
Ignores refreshers and stock movement, so the Year-4 drop is a surprise.