84.51° Data Engineer Salary by Level
84.51° data engineer compensation by level, from individual interview and offer reports. The numbers update as more reports land, so they stay current and data-engineer-specific rather than the generic software-engineer bands most pages quote.
Data engineer total comp by level
Each level's figure is the median of individual 84.51° data engineer offers at that level, so it reflects a typical outcome rather than an average pulled up by a few large packages. Total comp counts base salary plus equity and bonus annualized over the vest, and the range shown is the middle half of offers, with the top and bottom quarters trimmed off. These are data-engineer figures specifically, which run below the all-software-engineer bands most comp sites quote at the same level.
7 data engineers have reported offers or compensation details for 84.51°, and that count is the first thing to hold in mind before reading the medians. A single ladder level, L3, means all 7 reports collapse into one band, so there's no within-company cross-check: a thinly-reported figure at one level can't be validated against adjacent rungs. Some of those 7 are verified offer reports with full comp breakdowns; others are base-only public filings where bonus and equity totals are modeled from peer ratios rather than confirmed by the engineer. The medians as of Aug 2, 2026 are the best available signal for this company, but a pool this size amplifies the weight of any single outlier. Treat the range, $155K-$166K at L3, as more informative than the median alone.
Every 84.51° comp sample on record
One dot per reported offer, plotted against years of experience and colored by level. Toggle levels or switch between total comp and base. The spread is the honest picture the medians summarize.
84.51° sits inside Kroger's corporate structure, and that ownership context shapes how offers are built. Total comp at L3 centers on base salary, with an annual target bonus layer that typically reflects retail-sector norms: a percentage of base tied to company and individual performance, paid in cash rather than equity. Kroger subsidiaries generally do not offer significant RSU grants to individual contributor engineering roles the way a publicly-traded tech company would, so the headline number skews closer to realized annual pay than it would at an equity-heavy employer. That means the $163K figure is not a mix of vested shares and a suppressed cash salary; what you see in the base-plus-bonus structure is largely what lands in your account each year. Engineers coming from RSU-heavy offers should convert carefully, since the absence of a meaningful equity component makes direct comparisons misleading.
Culture and sentiment at 84.51°
What the offer feels like from the inside, not just the number. Glassdoor and forum readings plus happiness and layoff-risk signals, updated as new data lands.
At $163K, pay at 84.51° sits in line with other Retail companies, which is a reasonable outcome for a subsidiary analytics org in Cincinnati. The likeliest read is that two forces set the floor here: geographic cost adjustment for a Midwestern headquarters, and the compensation ceiling that comes with operating inside a parent retailer rather than as an independent tech entity. Kroger controls resource allocation, and retail operating margins are thin relative to software businesses, so the comp ceiling reflects that margin structure rather than a signal about how 84.51° values data engineering work specifically. The premium for Databricks and Azure fluency that commands outsized pay in coastal fintech or cloud-native SaaS markets gets partially absorbed by the location and parent-company context. That's not a criticism, it's the mechanism behind where the number sits.
Glassdoor and forum readings are third-party aggregates; the happiness and layoff-risk tiers are modeled weekly from primary signals.
How the offer level (and the comp curve) is decided
Your level is set during the loop, before team match. The band widens with seniority, so the same performance lands very different comp depending on which curve you get placed on.
The single ladder level in the reported pool means you can't move the offer by targeting a higher rung inside 84.51°'s DE structure the way you could at a company with 4 or 5 visible bands. With 7 reports clustered in a narrow range of $155K-$166K, the band appears tight. The most effective negotiation lever here is the base itself, since there's no equity package to reprice and bonus targets at retail subsidiaries tend to follow fixed percentage schedules. A competing offer from another analytics org, particularly one with a Databricks-heavy stack where your skills transfer directly, is the concrete signal that moves a base conversation at a company like this. Abstract market rate claims are less effective than a specific number from a comparable role. If you're holding an offer, get the competing figure in writing before the conversation, and lead with base rather than total comp.
Recruiter calibration
The recruiter sets a target level from your experience and project scope, and shares a band. The band is a bracket, not the offer.
Interview loop ✕
Performance sets your final level. Strong rounds bump you a level; a weak round drops you. This is where the comp curve is decided.
Debrief / committee
Interviewers compare notes and set level and band. Consistency across rounds matters as much as any single strong one.
Offer + negotiation
Base, bonus, equity, and sign-on are visible. Equity usually has the widest band and is the main lever; a written competing offer moves it most.
Reading the equity, not just the headline number
The most misread part of a big-tech offer is the equity curve. A multi-year RSU grant is not a flat annual number, and what you negotiate should account for how it vests and refreshes.
Your offer includes a 4-year RSU grant worth $240K. What is your equity income in Year 4, and what should you actually negotiate?
Works out the vest: roughly $60K/yr if it vests evenly, and recognizes the original grant ends after 4 years, so without refreshers equity income drops in Year 4-5.
Negotiates the equity grant and the refresher expectation, not just base, and notes the grant is fixed in shares at signing so the dollar value floats with the stock.
Assumes the RSU value is a fixed cash amount that continues forever, and negotiates only base.
Ignores refreshers and stock movement, so the Year-4 drop is a surprise.
How 84.51° pay splits: base, bonus, equity
The composition behind each level's total comp, from individual offer reports. Equity is the lever that grows with seniority.
Median base, bonus, and annualized equity per level from individual 84.51° offer reports. The equity share climbs sharply at senior levels. the headline total moves with the stock, not the base.